Post by thinkinkmesa on Aug 20, 2007 23:49:38 GMT -5
Truth and Justice For George Skatzes
A victim of Ohio's Flawed Injustice System
"First we have the verdict, then we have the trial"
Staughton Lynd
justiceforgeorgeskatzes.webs.com/
Justice for George Skatzes
georgeskatzes.proboards101.com/index.cgi?board=geoisinn&action=display&thread=1179695618
THE INNOCENCE OF GEORGE SKATZE
NOTE: The following is intended both as a contribution to Defendant Skatzes' forthcoming pleading in response to the State's "Motion to Dismiss Defendant's Petition to Vacate," and as a free-standing explanation of Skatzes' innocence of the two charges for which he was sentenced to death: the aggravated murder of Earl Elder, and the aggravated murder of David Sommers.
The Elder Killing
Prisoner Earl Elder was killed by other prisoners on the first day of the uprising, April 11, in pod L-6 of the occupied cell block.
The State concedes that there were three separate assaults
on Earl Elder. First, "Elder was beaten severely by inmates when he was removed from the L-2 safe well, where he had locked himself with Corrections Officer Ratcliff." Motion to Dismiss at 15. Second, after Elder had been taken to cell L-6-60, prisoner Rodger Snodgrass "repeatedly stabbed him." ~ Third, other prisoners --the State names only prisoner Johnny Roper -- "inflicted further damage.
However, the State's summary omits crucial details which demonstrate that the wounds inflicted by Snodgrass were not fatal and that the fatal wounds were inflicted in the third assault, with which Skatzes had no connection whatever.
Rodger Snodgrass testified that he went into L-6-60 and stabbed Elder repeatedly with a very thin, long, icepick type shank. Tr. at 4395-96, 4590. He repeated this description of
his weapon in state v. Robb, Tr. at 3757, and State v. Sanders, Tr. at 2623. In State v. Skatzes, prosecution witness Tim Williams corroborated Snodgrass on this point, testifying that Snodgrass was able to slide his four fingers through and make a fist out of his hand with the point of the weapon protruding. Tr. at 3072.
The coroner, Dr. Larry Tate, testified that the icepick type instrument made only superficial, non-lethal wounds. He
described the difference in appearance between the puncture
wounds made by an icepick, and the wounds made by a broad-edged weapon like a knife. Tr. at 4840-44. The lethal injuries to Elder were made by a weapon with a "large edge" like a knife. ~ at 4837, 4843, 4845.
Snodgrass also testified that, after his assault on Elder, Elder was "still alive." Tr. at 4395. Williams testified that after Snodgrass left L block, Roper went back into L-6-60 and stabbed Elder about four times with a different weapon, which Williams agreed was a "homemade knife." Tr. at 3072, 3076-77.
It is unclear whether the fatal wounds to Elder were inflicted by Roper, as prosecution witnesses testified at trial, or by other prisoners, using a piece of broken glass, Post- Conviction Petition, Exhibit 19. The State's chief investigator agrees tha.t Dr..Tate, the coroner, found a "small fragment of silver metal along with a chard of glass" in Elder's body.
Motion to Dismiss, Affidavit of Howard W. Hudson, para. 11.
What is crystal clear is that even if Defendant were to
~
acce2t as true all the testimony of Rodaer Snodarass, Tim Williams. and Dr. Tate, Defendant had no connection with the third assault that actually killed Earl Elder. At most he should have been charged with attempted murder or felonious assault.
The Sommers Killing
Prisoner David Sommers was killed by other prisoners on the last day of the Lucasville uprising, April 21, in pod L-7 within the occupied cell block.
After the initial post-conviction pleadings were filed by Defendant Skatzes and by the State, the sixth circuit Court of Appeals, on April 28, 2004, reversed the conviction of John David Stumpf in state v. Stumpf, 56 Ohio St.3d 712, 565 N.E.2d 835, 1990, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 1839 (1990) .This Court of Appeals decision is at 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 8332*, 2004 FED App. 0124P (6th Cir.} The State argues in its Motion to Dismiss Skatzes' petition at 4 that "post conviction actions are limited to constitutional issues only." Stumpf requires reversal of the conviction of George Skatzes for the murder of David Sommers as a violation of his constitutional right to due process.
Stumpf was convicted as the "actual shooter" of Mary Jane stout. "At a later trial of Stumpf's accomplice Wesley, however, the state presented the testimony of a jail house informant to establish that Wesley was the shooter." 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 8332 at *3. Stumpf was sentenced to death and Wesley to life imprisonment for the same act: firing the fatal bullets that killed Ms.Stout.
Citing decisions of the 8th, 9th and 11th federal appeals courts, the sixth circuit panel concluded in StumQf: "we now join our sister circuits in concluding that the use of inconsistent, irreconcilable theories to convict two defendants for the same crime is a due process violation." ~ at *49. The convictions of both Stumpf and Wesley must be set aside, the Court held. Accordingly, the panel reversed the decision below in state v. Stumpf, and remanded the case "with instructions to issue the writ of habeas corpus in the petitioner's favor, unless the state elects to retry him within 90 days of the date of entry of the conditional writ." ~ at *70-71.
Understandably, since Stumpf had not yet been decided, the parties in this case have not previously brought before the Court the fact that, in separate trials, George Skatzes and Aaron Jefferson were convicted of striking the same fatal blow that killed David Sommers. Just as in the cases of the two men convicted of firing the same bullets that killed Mary Jane stout, the convictions of both Skatzes and Jefferson violated their constitutional right to due process and must be reversed.
In State v. Skatzes and again in state v. Jefferson, Coroner Leo Burger testified that the cause of death was one massive blow to the head. He said that the injury could well have been inflicted by a baseball bat. He described "a single injury with a blunt instrument, extremely forceful, not only fracturing the bone, shattering [it] in pieces, but also, separating the natural bone, suture lines." State v. Skatzes, Tr. at 3292-94. Dr.Burger was explicit that this single blow was the cause of death: Q. Doctor, do you have an opinion to a reasonable degree of medical certainty as to the cause of death of David Sommers?
A. Yes, cause of death is massive single injury to the head.
~ at 3295.
The obvious next question is, Whostruck the single, fatal blow?
Addressing the jury both at the beginning and at the end of the trial of Defendant Skatzes, prosecutor Hogan said that it was Skatzes In opening argument in state v. Skatzes, prosecutor Hogan stated:
On the third killing of David Summers ["Sommers"] at
the very end of the riot, you will hear evidence that Mr. Skatzes wielded the ball bat, smashed Mr. Summers' skull
into a number of pieces. He didn't act alone. There were a number of people involved in the beating and stabbing and strangling, but he was the principal offender in that particular killing.
Tr. at 1542 (emphasis added) .In closing argument, prosecutor Hogan repeated:
[T]hink about David Sommers, the third, the last of the
three killings, the one where he rSkatzesl wielded a bat and literallv beat the brains out of this man's head.
~ at 6108 (emphasis added) .
However, in state v. Jefferson another prosecutor told another jury that the principal offender was not Skatzes, but Jefferson. Prosecutor Crowe said in closing argument that in
1994 Jefferson had told the Highway Patrol, "I know that first lick I hit on him [Sommers] did damage. It leaked. I saw the brains leak. I got the blood allover me." Tr. at 656. This is a reasonably accurate summary of what Jefferson did in fact tell Trooper J. W. Fleming of the Ohio State Highway Patrol in Interview #1264 on June 23, 1994. On that occasion Jefferson told Trooper Fleming: A. So I went to L-7, matter of fact I had a baseball bat with me. .
Q. Was it an aluminum bat again?
A. Yeah, it was a Louisville Slugger. Steel bat. .
Q. Okay, you're down --he's standing at the bottom of the steps? In front of the showers.
A. Standing at the bottom of the steps between 41 and the shower. I come downstairs, I didn't even ask no questions. I busted him in the back of the head with that old Louisville Slugger.
Q. In the back of the head? A. Back of the head.
Q. Now, right side or left side?
Q. I just swung. I know it hit the back of his head. I tell you what I know that the brain was leaking.
Interview #1264 at 16-20.
Prosecutor Crowe told the Jefferson jury to believe what Jefferson had told Trooper Fleming.
If there was only one blow to the head of David
Sommers, the strongest evidence you have [is that] this is the individual --I won't call him a human --this is the individual that administered that blow. Out of his own mouth. If there was only one blow, he's the one that gave it. He's the one that hit him like a steer going through
the stockyard, the executioner with the pick axe, trying to put the pick through the brain. That put that baseball bat into the brain of David Sommers.
Tr. at 657 (emphasis added) .
The prosecution's conduct in convicting Skatzes and then Jefferson for the same offense (a single massive blow to the head that killed David Sommers) precisely parallels the prosecution's conduct in convicting stumpf and then Wesley for the same offense (firing the bullets that killed Mary Jane stout) .If the due process rights of Stumpf and Wesley to a fair trial were thereby violated, requiring reversal of their sentences 'and convictions, so were the due process rights of Skatzes and Jefferson. Because this is a "constitutional issue," Motion to Dismiss at 4, the verdicts and sentences against Skatzes and Jefferson must be vacated.
Conclusion
George Skatzes was found guilty of the aggravated murder of Officer Vallandingham but was not given a death sentence. He is on Death Row solely in connection with his conviction for the aggravated murder of prisoners Elder and Sommers. Both these convictions having been shown to be invalid, Skatzes' death sentences must be set aside.
A victim of Ohio's Flawed Injustice System
"First we have the verdict, then we have the trial"
Staughton Lynd
justiceforgeorgeskatzes.webs.com/
Justice for George Skatzes
georgeskatzes.proboards101.com/index.cgi?board=geoisinn&action=display&thread=1179695618
THE INNOCENCE OF GEORGE SKATZE
NOTE: The following is intended both as a contribution to Defendant Skatzes' forthcoming pleading in response to the State's "Motion to Dismiss Defendant's Petition to Vacate," and as a free-standing explanation of Skatzes' innocence of the two charges for which he was sentenced to death: the aggravated murder of Earl Elder, and the aggravated murder of David Sommers.
The Elder Killing
Prisoner Earl Elder was killed by other prisoners on the first day of the uprising, April 11, in pod L-6 of the occupied cell block.
The State concedes that there were three separate assaults
on Earl Elder. First, "Elder was beaten severely by inmates when he was removed from the L-2 safe well, where he had locked himself with Corrections Officer Ratcliff." Motion to Dismiss at 15. Second, after Elder had been taken to cell L-6-60, prisoner Rodger Snodgrass "repeatedly stabbed him." ~ Third, other prisoners --the State names only prisoner Johnny Roper -- "inflicted further damage.
However, the State's summary omits crucial details which demonstrate that the wounds inflicted by Snodgrass were not fatal and that the fatal wounds were inflicted in the third assault, with which Skatzes had no connection whatever.
Rodger Snodgrass testified that he went into L-6-60 and stabbed Elder repeatedly with a very thin, long, icepick type shank. Tr. at 4395-96, 4590. He repeated this description of
his weapon in state v. Robb, Tr. at 3757, and State v. Sanders, Tr. at 2623. In State v. Skatzes, prosecution witness Tim Williams corroborated Snodgrass on this point, testifying that Snodgrass was able to slide his four fingers through and make a fist out of his hand with the point of the weapon protruding. Tr. at 3072.
The coroner, Dr. Larry Tate, testified that the icepick type instrument made only superficial, non-lethal wounds. He
described the difference in appearance between the puncture
wounds made by an icepick, and the wounds made by a broad-edged weapon like a knife. Tr. at 4840-44. The lethal injuries to Elder were made by a weapon with a "large edge" like a knife. ~ at 4837, 4843, 4845.
Snodgrass also testified that, after his assault on Elder, Elder was "still alive." Tr. at 4395. Williams testified that after Snodgrass left L block, Roper went back into L-6-60 and stabbed Elder about four times with a different weapon, which Williams agreed was a "homemade knife." Tr. at 3072, 3076-77.
It is unclear whether the fatal wounds to Elder were inflicted by Roper, as prosecution witnesses testified at trial, or by other prisoners, using a piece of broken glass, Post- Conviction Petition, Exhibit 19. The State's chief investigator agrees tha.t Dr..Tate, the coroner, found a "small fragment of silver metal along with a chard of glass" in Elder's body.
Motion to Dismiss, Affidavit of Howard W. Hudson, para. 11.
What is crystal clear is that even if Defendant were to
~
acce2t as true all the testimony of Rodaer Snodarass, Tim Williams. and Dr. Tate, Defendant had no connection with the third assault that actually killed Earl Elder. At most he should have been charged with attempted murder or felonious assault.
The Sommers Killing
Prisoner David Sommers was killed by other prisoners on the last day of the Lucasville uprising, April 21, in pod L-7 within the occupied cell block.
After the initial post-conviction pleadings were filed by Defendant Skatzes and by the State, the sixth circuit Court of Appeals, on April 28, 2004, reversed the conviction of John David Stumpf in state v. Stumpf, 56 Ohio St.3d 712, 565 N.E.2d 835, 1990, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 1839 (1990) .This Court of Appeals decision is at 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 8332*, 2004 FED App. 0124P (6th Cir.} The State argues in its Motion to Dismiss Skatzes' petition at 4 that "post conviction actions are limited to constitutional issues only." Stumpf requires reversal of the conviction of George Skatzes for the murder of David Sommers as a violation of his constitutional right to due process.
Stumpf was convicted as the "actual shooter" of Mary Jane stout. "At a later trial of Stumpf's accomplice Wesley, however, the state presented the testimony of a jail house informant to establish that Wesley was the shooter." 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 8332 at *3. Stumpf was sentenced to death and Wesley to life imprisonment for the same act: firing the fatal bullets that killed Ms.Stout.
Citing decisions of the 8th, 9th and 11th federal appeals courts, the sixth circuit panel concluded in StumQf: "we now join our sister circuits in concluding that the use of inconsistent, irreconcilable theories to convict two defendants for the same crime is a due process violation." ~ at *49. The convictions of both Stumpf and Wesley must be set aside, the Court held. Accordingly, the panel reversed the decision below in state v. Stumpf, and remanded the case "with instructions to issue the writ of habeas corpus in the petitioner's favor, unless the state elects to retry him within 90 days of the date of entry of the conditional writ." ~ at *70-71.
Understandably, since Stumpf had not yet been decided, the parties in this case have not previously brought before the Court the fact that, in separate trials, George Skatzes and Aaron Jefferson were convicted of striking the same fatal blow that killed David Sommers. Just as in the cases of the two men convicted of firing the same bullets that killed Mary Jane stout, the convictions of both Skatzes and Jefferson violated their constitutional right to due process and must be reversed.
In State v. Skatzes and again in state v. Jefferson, Coroner Leo Burger testified that the cause of death was one massive blow to the head. He said that the injury could well have been inflicted by a baseball bat. He described "a single injury with a blunt instrument, extremely forceful, not only fracturing the bone, shattering [it] in pieces, but also, separating the natural bone, suture lines." State v. Skatzes, Tr. at 3292-94. Dr.Burger was explicit that this single blow was the cause of death: Q. Doctor, do you have an opinion to a reasonable degree of medical certainty as to the cause of death of David Sommers?
A. Yes, cause of death is massive single injury to the head.
~ at 3295.
The obvious next question is, Whostruck the single, fatal blow?
Addressing the jury both at the beginning and at the end of the trial of Defendant Skatzes, prosecutor Hogan said that it was Skatzes In opening argument in state v. Skatzes, prosecutor Hogan stated:
On the third killing of David Summers ["Sommers"] at
the very end of the riot, you will hear evidence that Mr. Skatzes wielded the ball bat, smashed Mr. Summers' skull
into a number of pieces. He didn't act alone. There were a number of people involved in the beating and stabbing and strangling, but he was the principal offender in that particular killing.
Tr. at 1542 (emphasis added) .In closing argument, prosecutor Hogan repeated:
[T]hink about David Sommers, the third, the last of the
three killings, the one where he rSkatzesl wielded a bat and literallv beat the brains out of this man's head.
~ at 6108 (emphasis added) .
However, in state v. Jefferson another prosecutor told another jury that the principal offender was not Skatzes, but Jefferson. Prosecutor Crowe said in closing argument that in
1994 Jefferson had told the Highway Patrol, "I know that first lick I hit on him [Sommers] did damage. It leaked. I saw the brains leak. I got the blood allover me." Tr. at 656. This is a reasonably accurate summary of what Jefferson did in fact tell Trooper J. W. Fleming of the Ohio State Highway Patrol in Interview #1264 on June 23, 1994. On that occasion Jefferson told Trooper Fleming: A. So I went to L-7, matter of fact I had a baseball bat with me. .
Q. Was it an aluminum bat again?
A. Yeah, it was a Louisville Slugger. Steel bat. .
Q. Okay, you're down --he's standing at the bottom of the steps? In front of the showers.
A. Standing at the bottom of the steps between 41 and the shower. I come downstairs, I didn't even ask no questions. I busted him in the back of the head with that old Louisville Slugger.
Q. In the back of the head? A. Back of the head.
Q. Now, right side or left side?
Q. I just swung. I know it hit the back of his head. I tell you what I know that the brain was leaking.
Interview #1264 at 16-20.
Prosecutor Crowe told the Jefferson jury to believe what Jefferson had told Trooper Fleming.
If there was only one blow to the head of David
Sommers, the strongest evidence you have [is that] this is the individual --I won't call him a human --this is the individual that administered that blow. Out of his own mouth. If there was only one blow, he's the one that gave it. He's the one that hit him like a steer going through
the stockyard, the executioner with the pick axe, trying to put the pick through the brain. That put that baseball bat into the brain of David Sommers.
Tr. at 657 (emphasis added) .
The prosecution's conduct in convicting Skatzes and then Jefferson for the same offense (a single massive blow to the head that killed David Sommers) precisely parallels the prosecution's conduct in convicting stumpf and then Wesley for the same offense (firing the bullets that killed Mary Jane stout) .If the due process rights of Stumpf and Wesley to a fair trial were thereby violated, requiring reversal of their sentences 'and convictions, so were the due process rights of Skatzes and Jefferson. Because this is a "constitutional issue," Motion to Dismiss at 4, the verdicts and sentences against Skatzes and Jefferson must be vacated.
Conclusion
George Skatzes was found guilty of the aggravated murder of Officer Vallandingham but was not given a death sentence. He is on Death Row solely in connection with his conviction for the aggravated murder of prisoners Elder and Sommers. Both these convictions having been shown to be invalid, Skatzes' death sentences must be set aside.
